|
A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us:
support the site |
Secret Histories general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B : interesting glimpse of Burma See our review for fuller assessment.
Review Consensus: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review: Secret Histories -- or, as the US title has it: Finding George Orwell in Burma -- is an odd sort of mix of travelogue and literary tour of this isolated nation that now calls itself 'Myanmar'. Emma Larkin essentially goes in the footsteps of George Orwell, who spent several years in Burma as an officer of the (British) Imperial Police Force. But Larkin also wants to give an idea of life in a country that has been misruled by one of the most repressive regimes on earth for decades now. Hence also the thesis that, as the Burmese joke (apparently) goes: Orwell wrote not just one novel about the country, but three: a trilogy comprised of Burmese Days, Animal Farm, and Nineteen Eighty-Four.It's not nearly the stretch one might imagine, and Larkin dutifully makes the appropriate comparisons, from media control (where one of the ways you can tell that something is up ... say, with the banking system ... is when the media don't report on it) to methods of torture. Among the difficulties of writing about Burma from within Burma is that it is such a police state. Anyone might be an informer, and many of the people she talks to -- or the guesthouses she stays at -- get hassled by the authorities because of their contact with her. As Larkin notes: The authoritarian rule of the Burmese generals is well-hidden behind a curtain that is held tightly closed by strict control over the country's movies, music, books and newspapers. Indeed, I often knew more about what was going on in Burma when I was away from it.A fluent Burmese speaker, Larkin is at a great advantage over most visitors to the country, and she does recount many encounters and conversations. Everyone is desperately cautious, but people do open up to her, and she does give a sense of what it is to live in such a stifling atmosphere. Still, that only goes so far, and anyone vaguely aware of the situation in Burma won't be surprised by much that she (or those she speaks with) recount. Indeed, there are so many conversations -- and because practically almost all the names have been changed to protect those who spoke to her -- it all becomes rather indistinct and anonymous. Only a few memorable figures stand out. Too often, too, the complaints are reduced to the obvious. Yes, it's heartbreaking to hear the old lady say: This country used to be a fabulous place, you know. It was rich in nature and people, and so very beautiful. They have managed to turn a paradise into something not much better than a living hell.But that only packs so much of a punch after a while. More interesting is that shadowy authoritarian omnipresence -- almost never revealed in its acts of brutality, but rather lurking, as when a publisher tries to explain the way censorship works, including noting that: 'They never tell us exactly why something is banned,' said Ko Ye. 'We just have to guess.'Larkin does sketch out a fair amount of history and the current state of affairs, but one really only gets half a sense of the country and its many woes -- just as in restricting her travels (for the purposes of this book) to Orwell-territory she ignores much of the country, including the amazing site of Pagan. (Since the period Larkin was in the country the military junta has also moved the seat of government and the capital away from Rangoon (Yangon) to pretty much the middle of nowhere, in a typically bizarre and inscrutable step.) The Orwell-connexions are of some interest, as she does try to follow in his footsteps where she can (which also brings her to places more off the beaten track, like Myaungmya and Katha), and the frozen-in-time aspect of so much of Burma lends itself to this exercise as well, as she finds numerous Orwell-traces (generally accompanied by depressing signs of decay). Nevertheless, this feels very much like a book that can't decide what it wants to be: it likely would have been considerably more compelling as either a straight travelogue, or completely focused on Orwell-in-Burma (then-and-now). Orwell also proves something of a distraction in making her points about the awful regime that has destroyed the country, the Big Brother and Animal Farm comparisons occasionally almost seeming to trivialize the real suffering going on in Burma. A decent introduction to contemporary Burma, Secret Histories isn't entirely satisfying either for readers who know nothing of the country, or those who have followed it more closely -- or for those familiar with George Orwell's life and work. There are a number of scenes and observations that do make it worthwhile, but simply not nearly as many as one might have hoped for. - Return to top of the page - Secret Histories:
- Return to top of the page - 'Emma Larkin' is the pseudonym of an American journalist. - Return to top of the page -
© 2009-2011 the complete review
|