A
Literary Saloon
&
Site of Review.

Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.



Contents:
Main
the Best
the Rest
Review Index
Links

weblog

crQ

RSS

to e-mail us:


support the site



In Association with Amazon.com


In association with Amazon.com - UK


In association with Amazon.ca - Canada


the Complete Review
the complete review - literature



Monsters in the Archives

by
Caroline Bicks


general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author

To purchase Monsters in the Archives



Title: Monsters in the Archives
Author: Caroline Bicks
Genre: Non-fiction
Written: 2026
Length: 250 pages
Availability: Monsters in the Archives - US
Monsters in the Archives - UK
Monsters in the Archives - Canada
from: Bookshop.org (US)
  • My Year of Fear with Stephen King

- Return to top of the page -



Our Assessment:

B : a neat look at some of how works of fiction are shaped (through various drafts and otherwise)

See our review for fuller assessment.




Review Summaries
Source Rating Date Reviewer
The Guardian . 30/3/2026 Kathryn Hughes


  From the Reviews:
  • "This book is Bicks’s account of what happened when King gave her permission to spend a year in his archive, poring over the drafts of five of his most popular novels (...) This is the kind of close reading usually associated with academic lit crit, so it can feel odd to find it in a book aimed at King’s ardent fanbase. But Bicks deftly interweaves textual analysis with more general biographical data, gleaned from her conversations with King, both in person and via email. (...) (F)or those with the patience to follow Bicks’s more erudite detours into Stephen King’s monstrosity, there is much to relish in this highly original book." - Kathryn Hughes, The Guardian

Please note that these ratings solely represent the complete review's biased interpretation and subjective opinion of the actual reviews and do not claim to accurately reflect or represent the views of the reviewers. Similarly the illustrative quotes chosen here are merely those the complete review subjectively believes represent the tenor and judgment of the review as a whole. We acknowledge (and remind and warn you) that they may, in fact, be entirely unrepresentative of the actual reviews by any other measure.

- Return to top of the page -



The complete review's Review:

       Caroline Bicks took up the Stephen E. King Chair in Literature at the University of Maine in 2017 -- as a Shakespeare scholar, and with instructions from university officials not to seek out the local author after whom the chair was named. A few years later, however, King himself initiated contact, and then let Bicks spend a sabbatical year exploring his and wife Tabitha's archives -- located in an extension to the family home.
       Bicks focused her research on: "the five early works that I first read as a kid, and that continue to scare me today; Carrie, 'Salem's Lot, The Shining, Night Shift, and Pet Sematary". The resulting work, Monsters in the Archives, is then divided into five chapters, each devoted (primarily) to one of these works. . Her approach to researching these texts -- with the various drafts and related materials accessible to her in the archive -- includes also re-connecting with them as she had in her youth, to the extent that she purchases the editions she had first read them in, e.g. re. Night Shift: "I've purchased the paperback Signet edition on eBay (original cost, $3.50), the same one I'd taken out of the Castine public library". (I'm slightly older than Bicks, but the King editions of these titles I read and own are also the old Signet mass-market paperbacks .....).
       Much of Monsters in the Archives is focused on the re-writing of these works by King, Bicks comparing different drafts (which sometimes differ markedly from the published version) as well as pointing out some of the editorial changes made as the books came closer to publication.
       Some observations are of small details, as regarding this in Pet Sematary:

     In the first two drafts, Jud says "sometimes death is better." But King crosses "death" out in the copyedited version and pencils in "dead." The galley proof compositor missed this change, so King has to write it in again.
     A two-letter edit may seem small, but listen to what it does: the ed sound in "dead" and "better" creates an echo that wasn't there before. The kind that gets in your head and keeps resonating.
       But there are also significant changes in some of the stories themselves, and how King presents them, such as Carrie, and Bicks guides readers well through these.
       With Night Shift, Bicks also looks to King's early stories, leading her also back to his undergraduate days and the column King wrote ('King's Garbage Truck') for The Maine Campus between February 1969 and May 1970. Giving some idea of Bicks' thoroughness throughout:
These columns are collected in the Kings' personal archives, but I wanted to read everything that was in the paper each week to get a broader view of what was happening around him when he was writing them. The full editions are only available through UMaine's Fogler Library, so that's where I go next.
       Some biographical detail about King also comes up, especially when reflected in the artefacts Bicks examines, such as the oldest draft of 'Salem's Lot she came across: "comprised of 242 single-spaced pages of Olivetti typescript". The change in King's fortunes is nicely reflected here, as she writes:
King explains that he typed his stories single-spaced and with small margins, because "paper cost money, and we had none to waste on extra sheets for first drafts." A month before he completed this first draft, King had sold Carrie to Doubleday for $2,500, giving the young family enough money to move to an apartment in Bangor; the day after he finished it, he received the life-changing news that the paperback rights for Carrie had sold for $400,000. This windfall might account for the fact that he typed the second draft of his vampire novel on a new typewriter with courier font across 520 double-spaced pages.
       (As Bicks notes, the publisher seems to have done okay too: the paperback "sold over a million copies. When De Palma's film came out, that number jumped to four million".)
       Among the interesting asides re. The Shining -- famous then also for the Stanley Kubrick film version, which King is not a fan of -- is that: "King ended up paying Kubrick $1.5 million for the screen rights so that he could write his own adaptation, which came out as a TV miniseries in 1997".
       But most of the focus of Monsters in the Archives is on textual analysis -- close reading and comparisons, which offer interesting insight into how King shaped his works. Bicks selects good examples -- and follows them through well (though, yes, professorially as well). The personal touches -- Bicks recalling her early encounters with these works, in particular -- also help keep the book from becoming too 'scholarly' (not that there's anything wrong with that), though she does bring up Shakespeare (her academic specialty) noticeably often.
       At a lean 250 pages, covering only five of King's works (he has written ... many), and with some twenty photographs of manuscript-pages and the like, Monsters in the Archives does not wear out its welcome and offers some fascinating examples of the writing (and re-writing) process. King fans should certainly find it of interest and enjoy it, but really anyone interested in the creative process will find it worth their while.

- M.A.Orthofer, 17 April 2026

- Return to top of the page -



Links:

Monsters in the Archives: Reviews: Caroline Bicks: Books by Stephen King under review:: Other books of interest under review:

- Return to top of the page -



About the Author:

       Caroline Bicks teaches at the University of Maine.

- Return to top of the page -


© 2026 the complete review

Main | the New | the Best | the Rest | Review Index | Links